KHALIL AHMAD versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Police Rules, 1934, Rr 22 48 & 22 49 Definition of etiquette of evidence in which the bargaining for the purchase of heroin was viewed as unnatural, the fake consumer did not have the quality of heroin. Saw neither the defendant insist for some advance nor received the amount when the fake user did not even look in the bag before the heroin was handed over to the fake user if he was the heroin or anything else contradicting the witness statements. The conduct of prosecutors' witnesses about not recording the information received was of a false customer with the informant It also raised suspicion that the FIO (fake customer) and the inspector police should not record their movements on the basis of police rules after departure, settlement of the contract and the position of D-section P. Become The prosecution's witnesses not only violated the police rules but also deliberately misconstrued them in order to justify their conduct so that the prosecution's case did not affect the conviction. Was acquitted of circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Gaggo Mandi lawyer