Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANSAR versus GHULAM FATIMA

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) in the petition for leave to appeal the High Court found that the plaintiff, though not the owner of the property, was not the owner of the estate. This record does not justify the material presented by the High Court stating that the plaintiffs' property tax was not reviewed and no positive evidence was presented by any of the High Courts. Should have known that the plaintiff was subject to land revenue. And as an alternative if it is to be acknowledged that the property of the plaintiffs is not subject to the payment of land revenue and even if it is accepted that the trend of the authorities till now has been to the effect that a person like Owns No land shall be considered as the owner of the property, but all the arguments were followed by the old authorities, after which Hindu and colonial concepts were based on the concept of disparity of rights between different sections of property in rural Punjab. And this class discrimination was the main reason for treating a person even though a piece of land in a particular state does not own the property and this argument is no more applicable in present Pakistan under the current constitution. Was. And the role was Islamic, so even if the land in which the claimant owned it was not subject to the payment of land revenue, he needed an inspection about the property owner, and so on. To see the concept of the owner of the estate in a changing situation, especially after a new establishment of courts by Sharia where traditional law and practice Pakistan, top advocate family court from Rawat lawyer