MUHAMMAD LATIF versus FAZAL HAQ
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 145 (4) (5) and 561 rejected a defendant's plea on the ground that there was no peace violation and rightly disputed the police on disputed property. As a result of the directive to seize, the order has been approved. The persons to whom he took possession, in the review of the sessions court, however, acted contrary to the law in deciding the question of possession for the first time under section 4545 (()), CRPC, where The magistrate had already terminated the proceedings under section 45 45 (), Cr. Sessions Court PC Order Dismissed by Directives for Delivering Controversial Property Due to Illegal Property
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Gharo lawyer