ABDUL REHMAN versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 ?? Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 ?? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)? Equital? Revoke Appeal Against Alleged Occurrence? Animosity between parties, including previous litigation? Applicant argues that the prosecutor conducted an eye test? Witnesses were mentioned in the FIR and one witness was dismissed as a win, according to the witness, it was not appropriate to seek a trial court. The court said as a witness. This court statement demonstrates the effect that this incident has on the other eye's statement. The witnesses saw the attack on the man who had defamed his face and it was because of the privileges the court had shown to the witness. The accused persons and that is why it was considered by the prosecution as their own testimony and that is the version given by the court. The witness should not have been preferred over the eyes. Inspected by a Prosecutor?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Lasbela lawyer
