Find a Lawyer

MST. ANA BI versus HAFIZ MUHAMMAD TAQI

The Cantonment Rental Restriction Act 1963 Section 17 (2) (ii) (a) submits that proof of the ounce falls on the landlord, but there is an essential difference between the burden of proof and the burden of proof. In the present case, regarding the change of evidence in relation to the landlord's case, he charged and proved that the person living with the real person tenant did not come to appreciate his family and so on. All the tenant tenants and the person living with them had failed. The decision was generally made in favor of the landlord and against the tenants / appellants. famous high court advocate from Naseerabad lawyer