Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FARID KHAN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN

Referring to Articles 8 and 14 of the Arbitration Act 1940 (10 of 1984), Article 33, the dispute between the parties referred to a referee by the court on the consent of the parties, presented to the trial court in the context of reference Later, the court passed an order in accordance with the surplus. The decision of the referee to be treated as informational statement in the meaning of Article, Q, law evidence, Q, Q of, or an award within the meaning of section of14, is not only mediated by the referee Distributing disputed property but also cashing out certain parties to pay by way of compensation on equal reserves, therefore, Article 33, Conan Martyrs, 1984 can hardly be interpreted as providing information in the meaning of ref. 'S role was clearly understood. The arbitrator and proceeded accordingly, keeping in view the statements of the parties, he had misrepresented himself as a referee referee, thus clearly having an award which, without giving the parties a chance, filed objections to it. Without it, the court could not be ruled immigration advocates contact from North Wazirstan lawyer