DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN versus RAHIM BAKHSH
Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 15 (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A and 38 (3a) withdrew on charges of corruption but reinstated by the Labor Court. Gone, which can be a result of a fresh employer inquiry. Benefits plea denied that the worker had failed to participate in the latest inquiry, so the inquiry could not be completed as it was the employer's duty to pay the wages to the Record of Authority and the Labor Court order. Also complete inquiry based on the content brought. The Labor Appellate Tribunal amended the law, permitting wages representing the privileges returning to the Act, 1936
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Chakwal lawyer
