Find a Lawyer

GHAZIKHAN versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

The dismissal of the Sindh Civil Servant (Discipline and Discipline) Rule 1973 R4, dismissed in the Criminal Tribunal, with the charge of murdering one head constable, another head constable in the police department The court proceedings were also initiated which resulted in the dismissal of the appellant. The Department's proceedings and its dismissal were maintained by the service tribunal appellant, who instead of preferring the appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision of the Tribunal awaiting the decision of the criminal court, which had benefited him from the doubt. , When the appellant's conviction was upheld, when the department could not prosecute it, it was stopped, there was nothing in the law that could not have prosecuted a case where criminal proceedings were filed. Was civil in nature and the final form of a pending criminal trial Can be done. The court yard stick applied to the testimony of the evidence presented in the court proceedings was not as rigorous as it was in a criminal case and the result of one proceeding cannot be the same as in the other proceedings. A government employee who was granted amnesty in a court case may not necessarily be cleared from the charge in the court proceedings. The proceedings did not depend on the outcome of the criminal case, in which case the judgment of Brayat would not have the effect of reopening the judicial proceedings which would have been otherwise closed and no new cause of action would have led to the decision but the appellant. In the name of honor was not evil but they law websites from Jhal Magsi lawyer