Find a Lawyer

M. AMJID BHUTTA versus ABDUL MAJID TIWANA, D.J.

Section 2 (f) initially consisted of 2/3 rooms for business purposes. In the jurisdiction of some vacant land and an industrial connection rent control, no machinery was installed when no machinery was given out, on a thoroughly valid analysis of the evidence, it appears that the damaged premises were not used Not abandoned as a factory or industrial concern, but for business purposes. In order to exclude it from operation of Ordinance VI of 1959 and to have any property deemed to be a factory or industrial concern, to exclude it from operation of Ordinance VI of 1959, it must be equipped with machinery. The process of a particular preparation was involved in the dispute under the definition of such \ rent land \ or \ building and the rent controller had jurisdiction with respect to the eviction request. list of advocates from Thatta lawyer