NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Appreciate the Section 13B evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 that Padash's Inspector Police made no attempt to arrange an independent witness before or during the raiding operation, which he could have easily done, and on his own. Was convinced by the evidence and his head constable had made the prosecution's case very doubtful that the contradictions in the deployment of police officers could be trivial in themselves, but when viewed in the background of the absence of an independent witness. If so, he took on greater importance and corroded the fact of the prosecution's evidence. The police found the story of the hen and the bull nothing but the prosecution's story, so it was incredible and could not stand on its own feet, even if Defense Voice 4 was ignored altogether. Was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Jaja Abasian lawyer
