Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH versus STATE

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 (4) Establishment Division Office Memo No. 6/15/48 / ME, Date 31 3 1951 and Memo No. 6/39/57 / ME, Dated 5 2 1958 Esta Code 1983, pp. 217 220 Seniority. The appellant claimed sanity, mostly on the basis that he chose to serve as the Controller of Balochistan from July 1, 1970, and had passed the departmental examination and was regularly subordinated. The Accounts Service (Grade 16) was developed since the respondents were serving as Deputationist in 129 1975. And he was desperate to return to his parents 'department and after choosing not to develop in his parents' department, he opted to serve in Balochistan and could claim most seniority from that day. When he was granted the authority to serve in Balochistan in 1976. Appellant's case falls within the purview of the government-issued directive, and on pages 217 to 220 of Eden published in Estacode in 1983, appellant chose permanent absorption in the controller's office, from 1970 to Balochistan and It developed a normal curriculum in the Subordinate Accounts Service while the respondents were temporarily admitted to the office, the defendants could not count their former services for the purpose of seniority while their counterparts were already in the department. Served in the enrollment of According to the circumstances, the controller will be transferring from the parent's office to the office, as determined by the Office Memorandum 31 after the presence of seniority and other officers of the same grade under their authority to serve there. immigration advocates contact from Jalozai lawyer