Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.5

Section 16, Cotton Ginning Corp. heard that the applicant was not fully employed by the Establishment and thus refused to accept his claim for non-payment of wages as against the applicant. Finding the truth is the result of something he couldn't do. The full-time employee of the establishment should be kept in the sense that the applicant should take care of the interests of the original owners while the factory was running the petition without any substance. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Vehari lawyer