NAEEM AHMAD KHAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 497 and 498 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), an offense in respect of Articles 409 and 477 banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Section 5 (6) pre-arrest The bail, the accusation accused, alleges that the Bank's Controller of Branch, which conspired to engage the accused in a false case, was a supporter of the Union of Bank Employees, which was defeated by another union in which the accused was a strong supporter. The fact that the controller was financially affected by the lawsuit, and the fact that the accused was a strong supporter of the winning union. The Controller was not sufficient to try to convict the accused in a false case that the controller's malafide was not established on this score in such a way that an inquiry would be held against the accused. No allegation of mistrust over Controller M's case against the accused dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kotmomin lawyer