Find a Lawyer

M.M. SHAMUNE versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, DIRECTOR-GENERAL, POST AND TELEGRAPH

Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Art 212 (3) dismisses applicant as a result of applicant's seizure proceedings, applicant's departmental appeal, appeal before the service tribunal and constitutional petition against his dismissal failed; The High Court ruled that the petitioner was that although he had submitted his resignation, he was not informed whether he had been accepted and thus deprived of his pensionary rights. That is, such disputes were clearly subject to misunderstanding because, after the applicant, disciplinary proceedings, Dismissed The applicant for unauthorized absence services from duty was aware of the dismissal order because he had filed an appeal against the order which also dismissed that the petition was not exempt. Holiday refused law firms from Shahdad Pur lawyer