Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM

Section 96 The First Appellate Tribunal had fully initiated all the matters involved in the case, presented oral testimony as well as documentary evidence on record in its original context and came to reasonable conclusions, Was not open for trial. , Every aspect of the record matter and documents were discussed and after the conviction or denial, the evidence presented by the parties in the juxtaposition was found by the trial court's findings that they had filed the trial court's order. Exposed defects made by The findings of the record presented by the trial court were in accordance with the evidence, not only according to the record of this case, but also according to the law on the subject, the unwarranted decision was legal, unimaginable and factual. And the circumstances of the case and the appeal for non-interference by the High Court were dismissed online advocate from Rohri lawyer