Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KAUSAR versus RABIA KAUSAR

Section 5, Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage The application for separation of yarn ex parte decree was filed by the Family Court after the former person was convicted of the offense. The same judge dismissed the Family Court without seeking response from the suit wives to dissolve and dismissed the application by invalid order stating that there was no provision for review in the special law, the family court's order in the constitutional petition Was challenged to file a separate application for a prior decision and the decree governing their terms and conditions. Words was clear. The petition sought to be kept and reminded of the preceding partial verdict and decree, but the Family Court did not even read that the application was used by the Family Court to selectively modify the strange words S and It was rejected. The husband's request to set aside the previous judgment and order in Lemon W was even brought to trial by the trial court, considering the level of claims and petitions contained in the surface treatment of the case - including the law. The use, not to consider the matter, and consequently the non-performance of the responsibility as a judge, which had to be read at least. Consider, and then decide the matter, the requirements of law and justice were ignored, the family court not only misused its jurisdiction because of the clear withdrawal of circumstances, but also because of it. He also failed to perform the basic duties, without legal authority, without legal authority best law firm from Washuk lawyer