Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 302 (b) / 149, 201/149 and 148 of the evidence were filed with the FIR with a delay of five days after the murder of the deceased was not witnessed, which the defendants shared regarding the extra-judicial confession. And presented by an accused. One of the accused was controversial and the confession made by the accused was relevant to the details and did not explain what role the accused played in the murder of the accused. Extra judicial confession is usually a weak one. Being proof of type wasn't enough by itself. He was further weakened by the above contradictions between the stand taken by the prosecution's witnesses; the articles were allegedly recovered from the accused during the investigation because of blood stains. And they were not even connected. The victim's murder was a witness to himself, medical evidence could not accuse any perpetrator of the crime. The charge of conducting a post mortem examination was unrecognizable and it could not be conclusively proved that he was the victim or his death in that case. In fact, h was acquitted as an accused of some kind. immigration advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer