Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NOMAN KHAN versus STATE

Anti-Criminal Code of Conduct (V. 18 1898), Section 666 Investigation of Local Police and Challan Submitted in Special Court Court The legitimate case of corruption was registered by the local police and after investigation the challan was presented to the special court of anti-corruption, who charged and recorded the statements of the prosecution's nine witnesses, and then filed the case with the prosecution. Turned over to the prosecutor for transfer to the relevant anti-corruption establishment for investigation. The order is that the matter was investigated by the local police and challan was presented in the Special Judge's Anti-Corruption Court, while the Special Judge's Anti-Corruption investigation was not ruled out. Will go The deferred order did not properly exercise its jurisdiction to instruct the Anti-Corruption Establishment again. After reviewing the case and recording the number of witnesses recorded, it was no joke to send the matter to the Anti-Corruption Establishment. The trial could not be ruled out as an ineligible police officer. Had investigated. If it is considered for the sake of argument that the FIR should have been filed by the Anti-Corruption Establishment, it was still protected by the law presented by the Supreme Court, as has been reported by the PLD 1997 SC 408 An Unspecified Order Approved `Special Judge Antony was consequently left with the instruction to proceed in connection with the trial from the stage where he was b. property advocates from Gadoon Amazai lawyer