Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Testimony of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the eyewitnesses were the real brothers of the deceased, interesting witnesses, and even hatred against the accused because there was a long pending litigation between the parties, of which one witness testified. Admitted that there was enmity between the complainant party and the accused was dominant for the last 20/25 years, material contradictions were found in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, the prosecution could not prove the motive part of the story and no one from the location of the incident. The crime was not taken away. The alleged recovery was never sent to the firearms specialist until its usefulness could be ascertained that the prosecution of any such gun could be of no avail, Can't verify the case, which has a serious discrepancy between the medical evidence and the account. Medical evidence testified that the prosecutor's story was a serious one, and that the investigating officer had committed a crime of rights through the investigative process because the prosecution could not prove his case against the accused without reasonable doubt, The benefit had to be settled by the prosecution in favor of the accused who was not disclosed. Worth safe dependence on the case involving capital charges advocates from Kamokey lawyer