Find a Lawyer

M. JEHANGIR AKHTAR, M.D. LANDOO INTERNATIONAL, RAWALPINDI versus G.H.Q. ARTILLERY OFFICERS MESS, RAWALPINDI

Section 17 Petition filed by Applicant / Landlord for personal use against the Appellant / Tenant and the Controller of Rent Against Occupancy to reject the personal need of the landlord It was directed that the rent controller's order could not be considered in view of the statement made by the landlord as the evidence presented by the landlord as there is no evidence on record to show that the landlord. Is a reasonably appointed lawyer. The witness testified that neither the original nor any of the attorneys of the attorney had a copy. No evidence has been presented by him which shows that the witness is a lawfully appointed lawyer of the landlord, there is no doubt, he is personally present. There is no need to be and he can give a statement through his lawyer, but such a power of attorney had to be presented and the lawyers' request to be given the opportunity to present and prove the attorney as per their It has the power to make Tortney available, though it was not presented on record as the Empire Orders who spoke considered the entire evidence on record. Errors were approved, including copies of judicial proceedings submitted by appellant / tenants in support of their respective requests, which were dismissed by the rent controller pending applications pending before the rent controller. Which will be decided after providing opportunity to the respondents / landlord and proving the authority of the attorney. famous supreme court advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer