ZILLA COUNCIL, SARGODHA versus RANA MUHAMMAD HAFI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) To the extent of an employee's appeal request to be regularly accepted by the employer from the date specified by the employer on the complaint request The ban failed to indicate on what date the order regulating the services of the employees was approved and when employees were notified of this, the employees were also unable to identify. Expressed that, first of all, according to regularization of service, employees were paid only because Employees' services were regularized effectively from the due date, it would not be enough to show that there was a time limit for complaint notices and complaints requests when employees were told that they could challenge the regulator from that day. Or the wages were paid according to the complaint notices / complaints requests. There is no time limit under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Thul lawyer