SYED KHURRAM SHAH versus MIAN MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF
Article 14 (5) (5A) (6) and 11A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant (not a candidate) alleges against the defendant (retired candidate) that he had falsely declared that he The applicant did not face any disqualification in terms of Article 62 of the Constitution and in the provisions of Article 63 of the Constitution. The applicant picked up the nomination papers for the nomination papers, which was rejected by the petitioner. The petition was filed under section 14 (5A) of the Public Representation Act. In 1976, on the appeal of the Election Tribunal and the Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, to prove that a Member of the Provincial Assembly was elected before the Election Tribunal was treated under Section 14 (5) of the Public Representation Act, 1976 Was disqualified from. The Chief Election Commissioner was mistaken in regarding the applicant's `request 'as" appeal "and tagging it. Such orders of the Chief Election Commissioner / Election Commission of Pakistan and the Election Tribunal were set up by the High Court and declared illegal and decided another "appeal" against the applicants without any legal authority. ? The applicant will be considered pending and the Chief Election Commissioner was required to constitute another election tribunal consisting of three judges of the High Court to decide the applicant along with his disqualification. Until then, the defendant may perform his duties as chief minister and member of the provincial assembly principles \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Chowk Maitla lawyer