Find a Lawyer

SIRAJ-UL-HAQ versus STATE

Section 395 and 400 Law Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F Identification of the role of the defendant accused in the evidence, neither the accused's name was listed in the FIR nor Which role was assigned to them by the complainant or another. No witnesses and no articles were recovered from them. During the trial, the trial court sentenced the accused on the basis of their identity through the complainant, and the trial court sentenced the trial court to federal. The Shari'a court maintained that the complainant's statement was recorded in court at two and a half years after the incident, in the absence of a specific character attributed to each of the accused and the possibility of his non-participation in the test identification parade, the witness mistakenly accused This case cannot be ruled out because the memorandum has expired over time. Cometh. No body was to be punished for bringing the case against the accused unless he was found guilty and appealed on the basis of credible evidence and on the basis of the benefit of reasonable doubt. Appeal allowed for leave to be changed from accused to Supreme Court and the accused was sentenced pakistani advocates Hyderabad lawyer