MUHAMMAD WARIS versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Chishim Dade witnesses were closely related to the deceased, but no ill-will, hostility or argument was brought on record by the defense so that they could be accused of lying. To be given Involving the accused in the case and substituting it for the real culprit was filed immediately in the FIR, which caused the death of both persons, the names of both witnesses were also mentioned in the FIR. If I were listed, it could not be mentioned that if they were not with the deceased at the time of death, the eye witnesses would have explained their presence at the relevant time and thus, they were natural and independent witnesses. There was medical evidence of the incident. Devastating incident to ocular testimony After a roadside accident occurred, it could not be observed and the accused could not escape the unknown suspect. Even the red bullets were fired on a carefree person who, while demonstrating his cruelty and toughness, prevented him from any sympathy or softness, allowing the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer