Find a Lawyer

GUL SHABIR KHATYAN versus CHIEF SECRETARY/APPELLATE AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI

RR 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), dismissing Appellant for back benefits from Section 4 Service Appeal Intelligence, which resulted in the termination of employment on charges of misconduct. Was awarded The appellate authority was reinstated, however, the appellate authority was still silent on the order as far as the grant or any other previous benefits were concerned, for which the appellant appealed / represented before the authority. On appeal and not responding, the appellant filed an appeal before the service tribunal, which after dismissing the appellant's pending deposition of appellant's appellate court, decided to obtain a visa for the United Arab Emirates. It was decided, however, it was not clear when the appellant moved to the UAE and for how long. He was in the UAE and when he returned it was not clear whether the appellant had in fact gone to the UAE or if the appellant was out of Pakistan to earn his livelihood he would not do so naturally. Overseas entitlement to pay / pay for this period. Such inquiries require a full inquiry, in which case, the authority is remanded to conduct a full inquiry to ascertain whether the appellant had ever gone abroad to earn a living. Yes, for more than a decade, when and for what period and whether the appellant was useless without a private job. The Authority should also inquire as to why the Appellant's Department of Appeal has been pending for more than a decade? Fresh order in light of Investigation Report \ r \ n patent advocate from Mansehra lawyer