Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SAMI ANSARI versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION

Regulations 4, 13 and 17 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 Prior Retirement Appellant who joined the organization as LDC, for the year, in the post of Manager (Grade 11). The appellant's already acquired solid retirement, but the increase in his retirement year was not included in his terminal benefits. Appointed for more than a month, the appellant's representation was dismissed on the basis of an ongoing letter. Explaining through the finance division that employees of the organization do not fall under the definition of employee and the six-month directive applies to government employees, only the finance division issued another explanation after which it provided It was reported that the employees who retired during the tenure of public servants received the appellant for the usual annual increase on 1st June and 1st of December of one year since retirement. On 11th May 1999, the House Building Finance Corporation Service Regulations, 1957 Registered 4 and 13 clearly stipulated that in the presence of the rule, in which case there was a rule It did not have to apply government rules. The Division Office Memorandum shall apply and the Appellant had the right to an increment on his retirement which is 1999 1999 as the date of incorporation of the service authority into one increment is directed to recalculate the applicant's pension benefits. Was done Claimed by \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Chunian lawyer