Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ ELLAHI versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE

Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotion, entitled to appellant, while working as Head Clerk (BS 11) in Lahore, transferred to the office of Divisional Superintendent, Sukkur, without any. Reason served. Such a transfer appellant joined its responsibilities as a protest in Sukkur and after joining duty in Sukkur, the authority nominated all head clerks, except the appellant and the appellant at the training center authority in the course (2000). Despite being a junior in the office of the Superintendent of the Office and not being qualified by the Departmental Promotion Committee, the appellant was not considered to be promoted as such (by moving the appellant) to another division, The authority demonstrated an evil in the manner in which appellant was awarded junior status Was. The opportunity to attend the course, rather than the appellant appellant, was not treated in the proper and legal way as it was TR without liability in the Lahore Division of Sukkur Division with no services and against the Appellant's rules and regulations. , In the circumstances, being the Senior Head Clerk was denied the opportunity to attend the course, even if the Appellant was refused to participate in the years 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 During the course, when he attained the age of 58, he was exempted from the training course on development under departmental rules, Justice demanded. Beginners should be considered and promoted to the highest position. On the date of the office superintendent when she was 58 years of age, so that the appellant could not. female advocates from Kotli lawyer