Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI

Investigate by the Federal Shariah Court under Article 203D of the Constitution for the renewal of the integration of R-188 Pak Air Rules, 1951, R230 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203d Islam Shiv Moto Action. Under the Pakistan Army Act Rules, 1954 and R230, Pak Air Force Rules, 1951, the non-availability of copies of judicial decisions and other court martial documents under which an appellant reserves the right to appeal his sentence. It was denied that it would violate the injunction of Islam. Providing judgment, submission and other record of the case to a convicted person / appellant would be equivalent to denial of justice as he would not be in a position to present the basis of his conviction on appeal. Likewise, his fundamental right is to be heard personally or by the appellate authority through his lawyer; since the right of appeal is an important right, the refusal to copy the decision and the outcome of the appeal hearing Denial of the fundamental right to be. In cases of injustice at the Touchstone of the Quran and the Sunni Federal Shariah Court, the circumstances instructed the federal government to take necessary steps within 6 months to amend the Pakistan Army Act Rules 1954. The Rules of Pak Air Force, 1951, are to ensure that all persons who are convicted, whether they are within the limits or not, shall be provided with copies of the judgment, collection and other records of the case, except in small sentencing cases. Subject to review only. General Chat Chat Lounge n inheritance advocates near Toru lawyer