MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM
The suit for special performance of the Section 12 Convention Rule (XLV of 1860), section 180 agreement, was settled for evidence of the plaintiff refusing to sign the recorded statement of his witness and the notary appeared in court as a public witness. And his statement about the confirmation has been recorded. After recording his statement about the agreement in this case, the said witness refused to sign his recorded statement because he was not summoned by the court and after the plaintiff's trial court denied him the witness. Was brought before the court upon signing. The statement, signed the witness's statement and simply wrote a note on the recorded statement denying the witness in the order sheet, it is necessary for the court to order the witness to sign his recorded statement and if he If the order was not complied with then the court had to adopt the procedure according to the law, which was not accepted by the trial court witness, it was legally bound to sign it. His hearing and trial were legally able to order the witness to be signed because the witness's statement was read to him and he justified it and the court refused to sign it. Was denied. When the offense was committed under section 80 under80, the validity of the PPC witness's statement was not in any way doubtful as the impeachment order was signed by the court and the trial court was instructed. It was ordered to summon the witness and order him to sign it. In the event of a statement or denial, the court will exercise the powers conferred by the court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Jhang lawyer