BARKAT ALI versus FAZAL HUSSALN
Sections 7, 14 and 44 of the Partnership Act 1932, Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960, Rr: 35 and 36 Contribution property No individual has the right to claim the sole ownership of the partner partnership property. The dissolved plaintiff is expected to be the sole owner of the license when he has applied for the firm from which he was a partner, and cannot be accepted, and the licensing authority has incorporated the partnership property. After scrutinizing the relevant documents from was approved. Not all properties of a partnership can be called the property of an individual partner. In the partnership case, no intention was made that the license required to extract the coal was in the name of the claimant and the reference to the partnership was merely that the unknown claimant could not be allowed to claim the sole license of the expected license. He claims such entitlement after the dissolution of the partnership and not before the principle of Stoepless.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer