Find a Lawyer

AURANGZAIB versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) / evidence 34 Defending testimony alleges that the alleged victim was unsuccessful in attempting to shoot his carbine, ordered his sons to do so, As a result, the victim lost his life. Not to mention in the statements made by the accused to his sons Lalikara, the conduct of the accused, who was armed with carbine in questioning his two young sons, one of whom was a minor and the other at this age. Was crossing, killed, and reluctant to do so, it was surprising that no crime was recovered on the spot, the co-accused, who was prosecuted for being underage, was put on trial. The court had acquitted, refusing to deny the same evidence, the recovery of the fire was suspicious of the accused two years after the incident. Although very relevant but the record was silent on any action taken by the police to arrest him, the prosecution had thrown a wide net to get all the male members of the accused's family involved, high quality And good quality evidence, which had to be attached to the commission of the crime, was the decree of reduction in the case which resulted in wrong reading and non-recourse to the accused. The accused was acquitted with the evidence and the same was set aside best law firm from Goular Khel lawyer