Find a Lawyer

SYED NASIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus ZILA NAIB NAZIM, DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, SUKKUR

Section 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition for a motion of no-confidence motion, a meeting of the District Nazim Quorum was convened at the request of the respondents of the District Council, so that due to the incomplete quorum, the dissent against the District Nazim. There was no postponement of such proceedings, since the requisite presence of the members was not fulfilled, there was no evidence to prove that the notice was issued to all the members of the council. Were made, there was no evidence to prove that all members had received notices. The District Council was not meeting at the meeting, in which the district council members were required to submit notices so that they could attend the session, only 7 of the 65 members attended the session, two of which were proposed and the second. There was no such minutes that the meeting was kept on record as required under section 24 (7) of the Local Government Ordinance 2001, that the Zila Nazim had 7 members out of 65 to address the members in their defense. My attendance does not create the impression that under the Section 24 of the District Government's Ordinance, 2001, to invite the District Administrator, The necessary legal requirements for intimidation have been automatically foiled. The hostess had to meet who was lacking in this matter. No illegal acts were committed to postpone the meeting of the district council constitutional petition. immigration advocate from Kashmir lawyer