Find a Lawyer

QURBAN MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) An accused was not present at the raid and the fraudulent currency note was alleged to have been recovered between the accused by the riot only with the accused who did not exist. At the time and a prosecution witness testified through the evidence on the record that the fraudulent currency notes were recovered as well as the demand for tax notices, which were allegedly handed over to the accused by the accused, Although it was established by the prosecution, it was only the complainant's sole statement in the case that would have involved the recovery. Zim received because the co-accused of the bribe before the raiding magistrate explained that he had received money from the complainant for the taxpayer's deposit as tax money so there was reasonable possibility. It has been shown that suddenly the fraudulent money was recovered from the complainant as payment in the tax section was received from the complainant on record to establish allegations on any credible evidence, No doubt, convictions and punishments have been kept separate patent advocate from Talagang lawyer