GHULAM MUSTAFA versus RASHID AKBAR ANSARI
Section 12 and 42 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 230 of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11, against the rejection of the agent for the specific performance of the declaration and sale contract, even though the sale therein contains There was agreement. His personal competence, but in his proposal it was stated for himself and the defendant by his father had no exclusive right of any kind in respect of the property for any particular purpose. The case was registered, not in the memory of the plaintiff on the plaintiff's charge. That the defendant has any authority for the sale of the property by his father, under 5 230 of the Contract Act 1872, that no case against an agent was sustained, on the basis that the plaintiff could be dismissed. Contract the sale. Will not create any right, title or interest in the property itself, even if there is a sale agreement between the defendant and the seller's father, such an agreement does not create any interest in acquiring the property. ? ntiff To get relief from specific performance
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer