ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. versus MUMTAZ & CO.
Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance 1979 Sections 6 and 8 In recognition of the debt collection, the defendant had a contract with the bank, it was executed and as an additional security he made the property as mortgage to Medina. Shipped via three methods. Defendant received the law suit deferred for final settlement but chose to remain absent and did not file an application for defense of the case within the stipulated period after the summons service, Plaintiff testified on oath. And there were copies of the agreement, letters and fidelity and all others. Documents that are also mentioned in the claimant, as well as in the case of accounts extraction suits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Goular Khel lawyer
