Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN KHAN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RETIRED), MUZAFFARABAD versus AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT

Summary of retirement secret reports on completion of 12 years service of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 which stated that the overall picture of the service record of the appellant was very good with some exceptions related to the early period of his service. ? Appellant had been appearing on record for more than two decades before retiring when the annual intelligence reports recorded numerous times and lengthy notes by his superiors who praised the work of the Review Committee. Or government-issued guidelines found that prevention of annual increases in events in 1954, censorship in 1958 and warnings in 1960 were minor incidents for a long period of service. There is never a greater penalty than the good information received by the appellant Was done , In its report, before the authorized authorization, the appellant's record has been misrepresented. If there was a picture of fact and fact before the authority, then in the case of the appellant the retirement proceedings could not have been made by him: Review Committee Facts The violation of the law was gross misconduct and as a result the authority's action should have retained the service of the appellant until he attained the age of 60 years. The order of retirement and subsequent review was canceled and the appellant was instructed to attend the service from the date of retirement till date. Age Applicants will be entitled to all the benefits of the service and the benefits resulting from pensions, etc., for the duration of the rules and regulations. advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer