MUHAMMAD NOOR versus MBR-I
Arts 185 (3) and 199 criminal law (special provisions) ordinance (11 of 1968), section 3 (2Q law evidence (10 of 1984), article (2) conviction code (XLV of 1860), sections 302 and 34 conviction) Section 2302/34, Report of OPC Action Against Tribunals No Request for Evidence Case - Applicants were not given the opportunity to present testimony in defense The writ petition was challenged by the Tribunal Have the right to decide, and it is capable of making right or wrong decisions. This decision is not wrong because it allows the appeal to be granted without legal validity. Applicable to the offense, the applicant's guilt was based on circumstances where there was no evidence, either individually or collectively, and that the applicants were not provided with any opportunity to testify in defense, to the unclean verdicts. It is advisable to keep it on this earth only.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer
