ABDUL SAMAD versus GHULAM RASOOL
Sections 13 (6) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) attack on the default applicant's defense of rent withdrawal The withdrawal proceeding only applies to the applicant submitting rent arrears. There was no mention of the rent controller's order. The application for future rental payments was rejected by the rent controller to end the applicant's defense, but the appeal was allowed by the High Court leave to consider the context of the rent controller's order. There is no guide on how to collect your monthly rent. In subsequent months, no fixed facts and circumstances of the matter were not created for non-payment of rent. And that in view of the amendment made in Rule 13 (VI of 1959) of the Ordinance dated 1 1084, the defendants' application may be self-excluded because the applicant had entered into a written statement, regarding the rent point It claimed there was a small part of it, an order to be heard by the appellate hearing soon
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Dijkot lawyer