Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 2302 / Co 34 Co-accused found two of the four offenses, mixed with the co-accused's gun but since medical evidence was not in accordance with ocular testimony, the co-accused was acquitted by the High Court because he disputed. Based on the evidence, the co-accused participated. , Was set up but appeals against the British were not pressed because the parties allegedly pursued their dispute. top advocates from Khanewal lawyer