Find a Lawyer

KASSIM versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SANGHAR

Section 10 Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, 1956, Part II, paragraph 3 (2) read with memo. 12 4 1963 Respondents' foregoing allotted at least four acres of land under the Allotment Scheme under its proprietary right under which it was relinquished to India. The amount granted over the privilege was to be on a temporary basis which could be purchased by the claimant at such prices and, in accordance with such terms and conditions, he would not have the option of purchasing additional territory within such period. Much of the area resumed and the constitutional petition was finally reversed to present the appellant's case, the High Court held that Paragraph 2 of paragraph 2 of the Memorandum 12 1963 states that if a claimant wants to buy additional land Does not use its own option. By the due date, the additional area under its occupation will be resumed. This does not mean that the claimant's IPSO liability has to be taken from the responsibility of r. Excuse support best law firms from Manga Mandi lawyer