AFTAB AHMAD SIDDIQI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Payment Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 15 Travel Allowance Railway employee claims that he / she requires TA and other benefits while traveling. The complaints petition resisted the request that it was not. To be sustained because there was a separate forum for claiming deduction or delayed wages under the Payment Wages Act, 1936, the Labor Court rejected the complaint petition, the TA claim, and other benefits of industrial relations. Was not guaranteed or protected by section 25A. Ordinance, 1969
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Chaman lawyer
