MURAD versus MST. MOONDAN
Civil Code 1908 Section 9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 454 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), SS 50 and 77 Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115) of Civil Court Plaintiff / Applicant Because of the possession of the land in dispute as the son of the tenant in possession of the case for permanent injunctive jurisdiction, the threat was being made that the plaintiff / defendant was not forcibly accepting the position of the plaintiff / The plaintiff / person filing a lawsuit for permanent injunction against the plaintiff will be forcibly expelled from the ground to prevent it from being evicted. Plaintiff's lawsuit, when the plaintiff's case was stopped under Section 50 and 77, Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 and Land Reform Regulation, 1972, for the defendant's violation of the lawsuit. He is being threatened with forcible expulsion from the disputed land when he is no longer a tenant. The plaintiff of the disputed land is in custody, except in the case of the plaintiff, except that he maintains a lawsuit in court to prevent the plaintiff from transferring the matter. The provision under section 77 (3) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, will not apply in such case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Naudero lawyer