MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MALIK ZAHOOR HUSSAIN
Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 Articles 41 and 42 of the Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Section 23 of the Punjab Acquisition Land (Housing) Act (1973 VIII), Section 9 acquisition of land was completed and the compensation paid for such action. Determines giving up and resorting to the act. The eighth of 1973, under which the payment of compensation was made at a lower rate, to waive the acquisition proceedings to raise the question of termination of proceedings from the court's jurisdiction expressly based on the value of the land by the defendant. To avoid payment, which was the standard for determining compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the maximum rate of compensation under Act VIII of 1973 was limited to a specific price on one acre and 1973. The provisions of Act VIII were resorted to, instead of paying the market value, through the collector, the defendant was sued at nominal cost. Mains wanted to get as decided by the Act of 1894 f As the defendant was notorious, the civil court was able to move on in this case the provisions of Act VIII of 1973 envisaged his housing scheme scheme under which the plaintiff. The proposal to acquire the land was not under the Act of 1894 and, therefore, such land was not being obtained for the purposes of the Act.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer