Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979);

1987 P Cr. L J 585

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2347-B of 1981, decided on 31st August, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10--Co-accused in similar circumstances granted bail by Sessions Judge--Bail granted to accused by High Court.

Shaukat Haroon for Petitioner.

Sardar Muhammad Khurshid for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Hussain in a case under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at P.S. Mananwala vide F.I.R. No. 86, dated 13-4-1981.

The allegations against the petitioner are that he was seen committing Zina with Mst. Zainab Bibi on the night between 12/13-4-1981.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an old man i.e. more than of 60 years in age and the ground on which the bail was granted to the co-accused is equally available to him. He further submits that the learned Sessions Judge in his order after having held that the allegations against the co-accused that she was seen committing Zina with the petitioner were doubtful was not justified in refusing bail to the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert this aspect of the matter.

4. Without expressing any opinion lest it may prejudice the case of either party, I am of the view that the matter enquires further inquiry. The petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees tent thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C./Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura.

S. A./4607/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Satyana Bangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔