Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

KHALIL AHMAD versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 4A4A A speedy and negligent accused was accused of hitting his way home. It was the duty and duty of the driver to drive in such a way that it could pass without hitting a person or preventing him from shortage. The act of the brake suspect shows nothing but his haste and negligence and the victim could not be held guilty in any way.

1987 M L D 2030

[Lahore]

Before Munir A. Sheikh, J

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 3 others--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 in Criminal Appeal No. 421 of 1987, decided on 3rd August, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.426--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.409/34--Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)--Suspension of sentence-- Accused sentenced to 3 years' R.I.--Sentence being short and appeal not likely to be disposed of before expiry of period of sentence--Accused released on bail.

Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa and Chaudhry Captain Habib Ullah Khan for Petitioners.

Javed Shaukat Malik for the State.

ORDER

The petitioners were tried by the learned Special Judge (Central), Lahore and were convicted under section 409/34, P.P.C. and sentenced to 3 years' R.I. each and a fine of Rs. 5,000 each in default they have been ordered to undergo further R.I. for one year each. They have also been convicted under section 5(2)/47 of the Prevention. of Corruption Act, 1947 and sentenced to R.I. for one year each and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 each and in default thereof to undergo further six months' R.I. each. The sentences awarded on both counts were directed to run concurrently and apart from this benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. has also been granted to the petitioners.

2. The petitioners have filed an appeal against the said conviction which has been admitted. This is an application for suspension of the sentence and for their release on bail. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the sentence being short one and the appeal is not likely to be heard and disposed of before the expiry of the said period of sentence, has force. It is also argued that the petitioners remained on bail throughout during the trial of the case before the trial Court. I have gone through the impugned judgment and the arguments that the same is based on conjectures and surmises, tainted and discrepant evidence requires consideration.

3. In view of the foregoing reasons I am of the definite opinion that this is a fit case for suspension of the sentences awarded to the petitioners during the pendency of the appeal. The execution of the sentences of the petitioners shall remain suspended till the disposal of the appeal and they shall be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

M.A.K./M-338/L

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Khair Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔