Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

SANGE ALI ALIAS GHULAM SARWAR versus STAT


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Bail, Grant of Accused to Revolver Accused, Robbery Detained The revolver was not recovered from the alleged revolver case, there was further inquiry which was guaranteed in the circumstances.

1987 P Cr. L J 1610

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry. J

SANGE ALI alias GHULAM SARWAR‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 289 of 1987, decided on 24th March, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 392‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly armed with revolver while committing robbery‑‑Accused apprehended at spot‑‑Revolver not recovered from accused‑‑Co -accused allegedly taking away revolver‑‑Case, held, was of further inquiry‑‑ Bail granted in circumstances.

K.M. Nadeem for Petitioner.

Syed Sarfraz Ahmed, A.A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

The report of the incident was lodged by one Hamza Khan wherein he has stated that he is a rickshaw driver and two persons engaged his rickshaw. When he reached Shahrahe Quadeen Chowrangi, Mazar‑e -Quaid‑e‑Azam they asked to turn the rickshaw towards M.A. Jinnah Road. As soon as he reached at the back side gate of Mazar‑e‑Quaid‑e Azam, the present applicant, sitting behind him, caught hold of him by neck and kept revolver at his neck. It is further stated that the present applicant Ghulam Sarwar also hit the butt of the revolver to the complainant. The co‑accused took out Rs.150 from his pocket and gave him fist blows. In the meantime a police mobile reached there and apprehended the present applicant while the co‑accused escaped from the scene alongwith the revolver.

2. The learned counsel for the applicant has stated that there was quarrel between the complainant and the accused on the fare. It is significant to note that it is alleged that the present applicant was armed with revolver but revolver was not recovered from him and it is stated that the co‑accused had escaped alongwith the revolver. No one is going to believe circumstances of the case. It is alleged that the present applicant was apprehended then how the revolver had been taken by the accused In these circumstances it is a case of further enquiry. The applicant is admitted to bail. He be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) and P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Any observation on the merits of the case is not binding on the trial Court.

S.A. /S‑18/K Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔