صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔
Civil Petitions Nos. 819 to 822 of 1982 and C.M. Ps. Nos. 349‑R and 35‑R of 1985, heard on 21st October, 1985.
‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4‑‑Petitioner Government finally deciding cases of respondents which order challenged by latter in appeals before Service Tribunal Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw petitions‑‑Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
Khalil Ramday, Assistant Advocate‑General assisted by S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
Ch. Muhammad Asghar, Advocate Supreme Court assisted by M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. 1, 19, 20, 21, 28, 30 (in Civil Petition No. 819 of 1982).
Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents (in Civil Petition No. 820 of 1982).
Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents (in Civil Petition No. 822 of 1982).
Date of hearing: 21st October, 1985.
‑Mr. Khalil Ramday, Assistant Advocate General, stated that the Government of Punjab has finally decided the cases of the respondents on 1‑8‑1985, which order has been challenged by the respondents in appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal. In the circumstances he sought permission to withdraw the petitions without prejudice to the right of the Government to contest the appeals on the pleas raised in these petitions as well as such pleas as may be raised before the Service Tribunal notwithstanding the observation of the learned Tribunal made in the order dated 16‑8‑1982 which was impugned in these petitions. The request is reasonable and granted. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
M . Y . H . Petitions dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer