Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

FATEH KHAN versus THE STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 382B Panel Code (XLV of 1860), SS 302 and 327 Prisons already filed against the plea and sentence, however, to show cause to the Advocate General The benefit of Criminal Code Code 5 Code 382B issued for the offense cannot be extended to the accused for calculating the period of life imprisonment, Section 382B, after the CCP has heard the Advocate General. Expanded.

1986 S C M R 86

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and Nasim Hasan Shah, J

FATEH KHAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 66 of 1985 in Jail Petition No. 37‑R of 1981, decided on 8th October, 1984.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 382‑B---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss 302 & 327‑‑Jail petition filed against sentence‑ and conviction already dismissed‑‑Notice was however, issued to Advocate‑General to show cause why benefit of 5.382‑B, Criminal Procedure Code, be not extended to accused in calculating period of his sentence of life imprisonment‑‑Benefit of S. 382‑B, Cr.P.C. extended to accused after hearing Advocate‑General.

Nemo for Petitioner.

M. Nawaz Abbasi, Asstt. A.‑G. Punjab for the State.

Date of hearing: 8th October, 1985.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH. J.‑‑

The petitioner stands convicted under section 302 and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,000 and in default of payment of fine to further six months' R.I. He has also been convicted under section 323, P.P.C. and sentenced to six months' R.I. However, both the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

By our order, dated 15th December, 1984, the petition filed by the petitioner through jail directed against his conviction and sentence was dismissed. However, notice was issued to the Advocate‑General, Punjab to show cause why the benefit under section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. be not extended to the petitioner in calculating the period of his sentence:

Mr. M. Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate‑General Punjab, has appeared in response to the said notice. He has been heard.

We are inclined to extend the benefit of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. to the petitioner in calculating the period of the sentence of life imprisonment which he has yet to undergo. Order accordingly.

The petition is converted into an appeal and allowed to the extent only indicated above.

M. Y. H. Appeal allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Kotli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔