Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

NASIM AHMAD SIDDIQUI versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS


Article 212 (3) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Service Tribunal rejects all requests raised by the applicants for valid and valid reasons, with no exceptions to be taken. Was.
1986 S C M R 1669

Present: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S. A. Nusrat, JJ

NASIM AHMAD SIDDIQUl‑‑Petitioner

versus

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 547‑K and 548‑K of 1985, decided on 23rd April, 1986.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4‑‑Service Tribunal dealing with all pleas raised by petitioners and rejecting them for valid and proper reasons to which no valid exception could be taken‑‑Leave refused.

Kunwar Mukhtar Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M.S. Ghaury, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in both Appeals).

Nemo for Respondents (in both Appeals).

Date of hearing: 23rd April, 1986.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑

By these two petitions, the petitioners seek leave to appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 21‑10‑1985 dismissing two separate appeals filed by the petitioners. These appeals were directed against the order of petitioners' dismissal from service.

After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of the record before us we find that there is no valid justification at all for interference by this Court, for, the Service Tribunal has dealt with all the pleas raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners before us and rejected them for valid and proper reasons. Both the petitions are, therefore, dismissed.

M . Y . H . Petitions dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Kotla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔