Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus AKHTARI BEGUM


Article 4 (185 ()) Allow Appeal, Approval of Temporary Order Prohibition Temporary order must be in accordance with the views of the Supreme Court keeping aside the injunction and treating the law observations by the High Court as temporary. The final determination of the case should not be determined. Refused
1986 S C M R 1298
Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

SARDAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner

versus

AKHTARI BEGUM and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petitions Nos. 225‑R and 1054 of 1979, decided on 18th March, 1981

(On appeal from the judgment dated 24‑10‑1979 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No.976 of 1978).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Temporary injunction‑ Impugned order setting aside temporary injunction consistent with views expressed by Supreme Court and provisions of law‑‑Observations made by High Court to be treated of tentative nature not prejudicing final determination of case‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 9 to 11.

S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents Nos. 2 to 8.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑

This petition is directed against the judgment, dated 24‑10‑1979 by which Civil Revision No. 976 of 1978 filed by Respondents 1‑8 herein was accepted by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court and the temporary injunction issued in favour of the petitioner was set aside.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner we do not feel inclined to grant leave to appeal in this matter, as the impugned order of the High Court is consistent with the views expressed by this Court in Additional Settlement Commissioner (Land) v. Muhammad Shafi P L D 1971 S C 791 and the provisions of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application (Removal of Difficulties) Act, 1975.

Needless to say that the observations made in the High Court order being in relation to an interlocutory matter will be treated to be of a tentative nature and will not prejudice the final determination of the case.

M.I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔